Six-time British Superbike champion, Shane Byrne, wins court case after Snetterton race track collision

A six-time British Superbike champion has won a High Court claim against three sporting bodies over “catastrophic” injuries sustained in a crash, which left him unable to compete.

Shane Byrne collided with a barrier after coming off his Ducati Panigale bike at Snetterton race track on May 17, 2018, leaving him with several fractures and internal injuries.

The 47-year-old sued three bodies – Motorsport Vision Racing, which runs the championship, Motorsport Vision, which owns the track, and the Motorcycle Circuit Racing Control Board, a sport governing body – for damages, claiming that the barrier in place was insufficient and was responsible for his injuries.

The organisations defended the claim, stating that Mr Byrne was at fault for the incident and that the type of barrier was sufficient.

In a judgment, Judge Peter Blair KC said the bodies were liable for Mr Byrne’s injuries, which were “materially caused” by the collision with the barrier.

The amount of damages to be paid will be determined at a later date.

A hearing in London in May was told that the rider, known as Shakey, is the most successful in British Superbike Championship history, with 85 race wins, but has been unable to compete since the crash.

The incident occurred on a test day for the championship at turn three of the three-mile Snetterton circuit, known as Palmer Corner, while Mr Byrne was on his second lap.

Barrister Kiril Waite, representing the rider, said his client was thrown from his bike, which came off the track at around 60mph and went across a grass run-off area.

Both the vehicle and Mr Byrne hit a safety barrier, causing him “catastrophic” injuries.

The barrier, which Mr Byrne hit at a speed of between 15mph and 25mph, was known as a “type D additional protective device (APD)”, which consisted of tyres bolted together and was the minimum level of protection required.

Mr Waite told the court that a “type A” device – an air-filled barrier which acts as a shock absorber – was “the appropriate form of protection” and should have been in place at the corner, as it was elsewhere on the track, claiming that “the ball was dropped”.

The court heard that type A barriers were installed at the corner soon after the crash.

Malcolm Duthie, who was representing the sporting bodies, claimed Mr Byrne was at fault and that his injuries were “not caused by the absence of type A”.

He added that Mr Byrne’s riding was “the substantial and real cause” for the contact with the barrier.

But in a 31-page ruling, Judge Blair said the cause of Mr Byrne coming off his bike was “a foreseeable type of racing incident” and that it was “negligent” not to have type A barriers on the corner of the crash.

He said: “I am satisfied that the incident was not caused by rider error. Mr Byrne was not the author of his own misfortune and he was not contributorily negligent.”

The judge ruled that using type A barriers “would not have created a more serious outcome” than type D, adding that Mr Byrne hit the barrier with “considerable force”.

He said: “I have reached the view that if the claimant’s impact had been into type A material, he would not have sustained any of the serious injuries he did on the day.”

As a reader, we know the value you place on trusted local journalism. At the Diss Express we are committed to delivering the very best coverage from our communities, and we can only do this with the support of our readers.

By becoming a subscriber you not only support us in this mission, you also unlock a whole host of benefits, including unlimited access to ad-lite websites and digital editions of all our weekly newspapers. You can find out more about subscriptions here.

Use the promo code KevinHurst to get an annual subscription for less than £25 - we really appreciate your support. Thank you.